Article

Women, Ships, Submarines, and the U.S. Navy

Federal Practitioner interviewed Paulette T. Cazares, MD, MPH, coauthor of the chapter "Women, Ships, Submarines, and the U.S. Navy," from the book Women at War.

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Federal Practitioner: In your chapter in Women at War, you share your experiences serving on a naval vessel. Why do you think it is important to share these experiences?

Dr. Paulette T. Cazares: I think the period in which I served as a ship’s physician was unique; not just for me, but for anyone lucky enough to have the experience. Those outside the Navy rarely understand the day-to-day duties of a physician in that role.


FP: Can you elaborate on the psychological adjustment of fitting in to a mostly male world?

PC: I initially found that I was quieter than I typically am, especially in the wardroom and in leadership meetings on the ship. Once I became confident in my ability to find my way around the ship (literally and figuratively) and to understand my role on the ship, I was more outspoken, more of an advocate for my staff and my ideas, and more vocal at the right times and I believe, with the right people.


FP: How much evidence-based data are available on women’s health care in the Navy?

PC: Unfortunately, data on women’s health care is scant but is gaining interest, funding, and ground.


FP: What areas have been identified that need more research?

PC: Mental health outcomes are especially important and require significant research. This research can elucidate trends related to attrition, fitness for duty, and outcomes that require DoD interventions, such as those subsequent to military sexual trauma.


FP: Once women were permitted to serve, what medical care concerns needed addressing?

PC: Clearly, concerns related to women’s reproductive health were of immediate concern, but rates of substance abuse (including smoking), mental health diagnoses, asthma, and infectious disease, among others, are all of critical value.


FP: What changes regarding medical care were put into place?

PC: Women’s needs were given the same footing in print. Progressive, open-minded commanding officers implemented changes promptly, and those who resisted have slowly been eliminated over time.


FP: Is there any single health concern for women that stands out in your mind?

PC: I see women’s mental health as a largely uncharted frontier and one that necessitates great attention.


FP: You offer a number of clinical pearls in your chapter in Women at War. Can you share one?

PC: “Trust, but verify.” I have found that as the responsible officer, in many scenarios I need to be sure the facts are accurate. This was especially important on the ship, where the commanding officer relied on my advice and counsel and the crew counted on me to represent their needs.


For a limited time, a discount is being offered to Federal Practitioner readers. Click here and use the promo code AMPROMD9 at checkout.

Recommended Reading

Congressional Act Could Boost Maternity Resources
Federal Practitioner
HHS Grants Expand Home Visiting
Federal Practitioner
Women at War: A Growing Body of Evidence-Based Research
Federal Practitioner
What to Do When You Suspect Domestic Violence
Federal Practitioner
The Challenges of Malaria Prevention for Women at War
Federal Practitioner
Navy Triples Paid Maternity Leave
Federal Practitioner
Choosing Contraceptives: What Matters Most?
Federal Practitioner
Getting to the Cause of Vulvodynia
Federal Practitioner
Female Service Members in the Long War
Federal Practitioner
Medical Issues for Women Warriors on Deployment
Federal Practitioner